From October, 2013

Skype vs. Video Interviewing – The Battle of Free vs. Fee

ideo Interviewing usage is increasing among corporate recruiters and HR professionals who desire a more efficient, cost effective way to hire.  While the primary explosion2vendors in the space, Interview4, Hirevue, InterviewStream, Montage and Spark Hire battle each other for market share and positioning, their toughest opponent, Skype, may not even know that they are smack dab in the middle of a raging war.

Skype is a free video chatting service that many organizations have begun using as a solution to long distance hiring and the high cost of flying in candidates for personal interviews.  While Skype may have originally been developed for long distance lovers, catching up with relatives and love sick teens, it has quickly become the go to solution for many hiring managers.  Its free pricing structure and well known name make it a no brainer solution for overcoming the high costs of long distance hiring whether the creators of Skype intended for it to serve this purpose or not.

If you are looking to incorporate video interviewing into your hiring process and can’t seem to fathom why you might pay for the cow when you can get the milk for free, here are a few areas where Skype is missing the boat.

Fee-based solutions offer a recordable solution – Why is this important? Well for starters you can review and re-view the candidate interview as many times as you want and share it with other decision makers who didn’t attend the interview. Thus a more informed hiring decision can be made.

Fee-based solutions offer an automated solution – Yes interviewing candidates live is cool but in addition to also offering recordable live solutions, fee-based providers additionally offer automated solutions.  Automated, one-way or asynchronous interviewing essentially allows the candidate to interview themselves on their time allowing the hiring manager to avoid frustrating scheduling hassles and lost time.  Automated interviews are also recorded and can be shared with a hiring team upon completion.  This method also improves the candidate experience as they no longer need to interview at inconvenient times of the day such as during working hours.

Fee-based interviews are indexed – Like the chapters on a DVD, fee based recorded video interviews are indexed by question allowing the viewer to jump quickly to the relevant parts of the interview.  In minutes a hiring manager could make a determination whether or not to bring a candidate in for a face-to-face interview.

Fee-based solutions offer customer support – You’re in the middle of your Skype interview with a very important candidate.  You’ve established a good rapport and interview flow and then crash.  Who do you call?  If you are using a fee based service you or your candidates can usually call the vendor’s 800 number.

Fee-based solutions offer customer branding – People in the hiring world are engaged in a war for talent.  When a candidate logs into either a live or automated video interviewing portal they will be impressed when they see the portal branded with your company logo and even displaying your company’s message.  Additionally those in the executive search profession can send candidate video interviews to their clients branded with their corporate logo which of course allows them to better market their services.

See, I’ve just fired several unsolicited shots at poor ole Skype and they’ve done nothing to ask for it other than offer a video chatting service for free. Yes, Skype is hip and trendy and sure you can get their milk for free.  Fee based services though offer you the whole dang cow and that includes not only milk but hamburgers and steaks as well.

Are you ready to get your feet wet with Video Interviewing.  Please take advantage of this complimentary buyers guide!

Study Finds Significant Correlation between Video Interviews and Job Candidates’ Likely Success on the Job

Video Interviewing over the internet has seen increased usage, primarily due to time and cost savings in the hiring process. Surveys indicate that as many as 10% of organizations have turned to web-based video technology for interviewing job applicants. Despite evidence of reduced interview costs, no research has examined the validity of web-based video interviews.

Hire-Intelligence, creators of Interview4 video interviewing software, commissioned the first study to evaluate the technology. Using a sample of 75 professionals, Dr. C. Allen Gorman, a management consultant and Assistant Professor of Management at East Tennessee State University, conducted a preliminary study to estimate the validity of interviews conducted using Interview4.

The study found that ratings of the applicant, applicant characteristics, and interview responses all predicted job performance and associated work outcomes. Although an initial attempt at validation, the results are encouraging for organizations looking to lower hiring costs yet maximize interview validity and value.

“While significant cost savings are being realized by our users, our experience using video in hiring, literally over decades, has led us to realize that the biggest benefit is the greater insight video can provide employers versus any other screening technique short of a face-to-face interview,” said Jim Robinson, CEO and co-founder of Hire-Intelligence. “Time after time we have seen video interviews help get the best candidates invited to the face-to-face interview, even those who may not have passed other screening criteria, for example, resume keyword screening.”

A white paper describing the study conducted by Dr. Gorman for Hire-Intelligence is available at http://www.hire-intelligence.com/physiognomy-study/