Law Students Prove They Can Argue

According to US News & World Report, it seems a new trend is starting among law firms.  Frustrated by superficial interviews, law firms are trying out new interviewing techniques that can more easily help interviewers tell a good candidate from a great one.  One example of this is the firm Pepper-Hamilton in Philadelphia, where they crafted a three part interview process that requires the candidate to discuss and argue the facts of their writing sample with one of the firms attorneys.  By putting the candidates into a realistic scenario, they can more easily tell which candidates have the skills and personality required for their firm.

About admin

Justin has been working in IT since 1997. He served as a Network Administrator and Developer for TBI, a mid-tier ISP, before becoming involved in developing software for the Human Resources industry.
This entry was posted in Behavioral Interviews, Interviewing. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

7,424 Spam Comments Blocked so far by Spam Free Wordpress

HTML tags are not allowed.